mpv vs foobar2000

Both are free media players tools. Here is how they actually differ.

mpv and foobar2000 at a glance

mpv

mpv developers
Open Source

foobar2000

Peter Pawlowski
Free
mpv compared with foobar2000
Featurempvfoobar2000
Developermpv developersPeter Pawlowski
LicenceOpen SourceFree
CostFreeFree
WindowsYesYes
macOSYesYes
LinuxYesNo
MobileNoNo
Source codePublicClosed
Get mpv — official site Get foobar2000 — official site

mpv: what it's good at

mpv is a deliberately minimal player with no visible interface clutter, offering excellent video output quality, GPU-accelerated rendering and extensive scripting. It is the enthusiast's choice for high-quality local playback.

foobar2000: what it's good at

foobar2000 is a famously efficient audio player favoured by people with large, carefully tagged music libraries. Its interface is austere by default but can be rebuilt almost completely, and its tagging and conversion tools are outstanding.

Which should you choose?

Both are free, so the honest answer is that you can install either and decide for yourself — that is the advantage of free software over a paid trial.

Both run on Windows, macOS. Only mpv supports Linux. If open source matters to you, mpv publishes its source code and foobar2000 does not.

We deliberately do not publish a star rating for either. We have no way to verify a rating that would be honest at scale, and an invented one would be worse than none — so we give you the facts and let you decide.

Frequently asked questions

Is mpv better than foobar2000?

Neither is universally better. mpv minimalist, keyboard-driven, very high quality video player, while foobar2000 extremely lightweight, endlessly configurable audio player. The right pick depends on your platform and workflow.

Are both really free?

mpv is open source and foobar2000 is free. Both can be downloaded without paying.

Can I install both?

Yes. Since neither costs anything, installing both and comparing them on your own files is usually the fastest way to decide.