Kdenlive vs OpenShot

Both are free video editing & conversion tools. Here is how they actually differ.

Kdenlive and OpenShot at a glance

Kdenlive

KDE
Open Source

OpenShot

OpenShot Studios
Open Source
Kdenlive compared with OpenShot
FeatureKdenliveOpenShot
DeveloperKDEOpenShot Studios
LicenceOpen SourceOpen Source
CostFreeFree
WindowsYesYes
macOSYesYes
LinuxYesYes
MobileNoNo
Source codePublicPublic
Get Kdenlive — official site Get OpenShot — official site

Kdenlive: what it's good at

Kdenlive is a long-established open-source non-linear editor supporting unlimited video and audio tracks, proxy editing for smooth work on modest hardware, and a broad set of effects and transitions.

OpenShot: what it's good at

OpenShot prioritises being easy to learn, with drag-and-drop editing, straightforward titling and 3D animated title support. It is a sensible first editor for someone who has never used a timeline before.

Which should you choose?

Both are free, so the honest answer is that you can install either and decide for yourself — that is the advantage of free software over a paid trial.

Both run on Windows, macOS, Linux. Both are open source, so neither locks you in.

We deliberately do not publish a star rating for either. We have no way to verify a rating that would be honest at scale, and an invented one would be worse than none — so we give you the facts and let you decide.

Frequently asked questions

Is Kdenlive better than OpenShot?

Neither is universally better. Kdenlive mature multi-track open-source video editor, while OpenShot simple, beginner-friendly video editor. The right pick depends on your platform and workflow.

Are both really free?

Kdenlive is open source and OpenShot is open source. Both can be downloaded without paying.

Can I install both?

Yes. Since neither costs anything, installing both and comparing them on your own files is usually the fastest way to decide.