FileZilla vs FreeFileSync

Both are free file management & compression tools. Here is how they actually differ.

FileZilla and FreeFileSync at a glance

FileZilla

Tim Kosse
Open Source

FreeFileSync

Zenju
Open Source
FileZilla compared with FreeFileSync
FeatureFileZillaFreeFileSync
DeveloperTim KosseZenju
LicenceOpen SourceOpen Source
CostFreeFree
WindowsYesYes
macOSYesYes
LinuxYesYes
MobileNoNo
Source codePublicPublic
Get FileZilla — official site Get FreeFileSync — official site

FileZilla: what it's good at

FileZilla is the most widely used free FTP client, with a dual-pane interface, a transfer queue that resumes interrupted uploads, and a site manager for storing server connections — a staple of web development work.

FreeFileSync: what it's good at

FreeFileSync compares and synchronises folders, drives and network shares, showing exactly what will change before it acts. It handles very large file sets efficiently and can run scheduled, automated sync jobs.

Which should you choose?

Both are free, so the honest answer is that you can install either and decide for yourself — that is the advantage of free software over a paid trial.

Both run on Windows, macOS, Linux. Both are open source, so neither locks you in.

We deliberately do not publish a star rating for either. We have no way to verify a rating that would be honest at scale, and an invented one would be worse than none — so we give you the facts and let you decide.

Frequently asked questions

Is FileZilla better than FreeFileSync?

Neither is universally better. FileZilla the standard cross-platform FTP, FTPS and SFTP client, while FreeFileSync folder comparison and synchronisation done properly. The right pick depends on your platform and workflow.

Are both really free?

FileZilla is open source and FreeFileSync is open source. Both can be downloaded without paying.

Can I install both?

Yes. Since neither costs anything, installing both and comparing them on your own files is usually the fastest way to decide.